Tri Talk HomepageTri Talk EventsTri Talk ForumsBlogsTri Talk TrainingTri TradeTriPlayerWikiTeam Tri Talk
The Sir Bradley Wiggins Appreciation Thread
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TriTalk.co.uk Forum Index -> General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jibberjim




Joined: 15 Aug 2008
Posts: 7937
Location: Kingston

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tuckandgo wrote:
One is fine, the other is not. Proving which one is the truth is neigh on impossible.

1 medical problem.
2 legitimate possible treatments.
1 treatment has positive side affects. It may not be quite as effective as treating the original problem but you'll go faster.
I'll take that please.


That requires the doctors reviewing the granting of the TUE to be complicit, since with the above it should always fail, even in less obvious cases where the doctors modify the evidence to favour the positive side effect one it would hopefuly still be caught. Of course the UCI doctor at the time was hardly uncontroversial, although Cookson said there was no cloud.
_________________
Jibbering Sports Stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jorgan




Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Posts: 15331
Location: alles was ich bin, alles was ich war

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As previously said, what's to say a "4% disadvantage" isn't improved by 6% by using a TUE for a banned PED.

In all probability, SKY know a lack of medical records means nothing will stick in this scenario (failing any new evidence). I mean, c'mon... they have all the TUE paperwork available on file, but where are the medical documents to back it up.
_________________
24 Years since it all began....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
explorerJC




Joined: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 13620
Location: Farthingstone

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jorgan wrote:
As previously said, what's to say a "4% disadvantage" isn't improved by 6% by using a TUE for a banned PED.

In all probability, SKY know a lack of medical records means nothing will stick in this scenario (failing any new evidence). I mean, c'mon... they have all the TUE paperwork available on file, but where are the medical documents to back it up.


i would be interested to see the audit trail of the 40 doses of triamcinolone

i assume that we picked up the tab for this
_________________
www.appliedtri.co.uk Tri and Du coaching

www.naturalrunningform.co.uk Natural Running Form Coach

2017 Training Camps http://www.appliedtri.co.uk/training-camps/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TriTalk.co.uk Forum Index -> General All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3
  Share
 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum





Home | About TT | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Advertising | Contact TT
Copyright ©2003-2015 TriTalk®.co.uk. All rights reserved.