Tri Talk HomepageTri Talk EventsTri Talk ForumsBlogsTri Talk TrainingTri TradeTriPlayerWikiTeam Tri Talk
Sub missing in South Atlantic...
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TriTalk.co.uk Forum Index -> Off-Topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
FatPom




Joined: 26 Dec 2005
Posts: 4916
Location: My happy place

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 6:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not so much box of frogs, more akin to a shipping container full of Kermits with a Jack Nicholson complex. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SloggingScotsman




Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 2639

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 6:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

explorerJC wrote:
No thanks, but it is a welcome return of the esoterics joker....
pity.

Substance over form Ejc, substance over form.

Anyhow this ‘joker’ has been incredibly patient with you over the years Ejc, probably best if we part company.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul L




Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 4352
Location: London

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SloggingScotsman wrote:
…Previously you noted that you point out my inconsistencies.

I would ask you to name 1…

I think you will struggle. Why? I am almost anal about being auditable…


SloggingScotsman wrote:
what I post is all auditable, Verifiable, and true…



SloggingScotsman wrote:
..,It is however entirely possible to find it from an armchair in Scotland, as long as you have...

1. Someone competent in the US declassified crv stage 2 level, who is able to feel temperature, density and salinity changes.

2. A mathematician with a big computer.

3. Access to current global ocean sensor data.


How is the above post in any way auditable, verifiable and true?

The “facts” are nothing more than you believe this is going to work given the correct resources.

But in the absence of these resources, it remains nothing more than a theory and is therefore not auditable, verifiable and true.

I know you think people are having a go at you, but you have redefined truth to suit your approach.

If someone tells me they believe in god, who am I to challenge them?

But the simple fact is that no one can actually prove that god exists, it is an act of faith.

Unfortunately, you regularly confuse faith with fact and just can’t see it when others point it out.

Cheers, Paul. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
explorerJC




Joined: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 14788
Location: Farthingstone

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SloggingScotsman wrote:
explorerJC wrote:
No thanks, but it is a welcome return of the esoterics joker....
pity.

Substance over form Ejc, substance over form.

Anyhow this ‘joker’ has been incredibly patient with you over the years Ejc, probably best if we part company.


You don't need to be patient with me! All I am doing is posting my thoughts and opinions on a forum.

So, to the inconsistencies. I hold Paul L's view that you mistake belief for either fact or objective judgement, but i have tried to go down that road before and therefore:

On the 29th June 2016 you posted: "Bearing in mind that i am now advancing remote viewing." on your "A note to British spooks and to European politicians thread".

I will leave it to the TT masses as to whether that is consistent with your current stance.
_________________
www.appliedtri.co.uk Tri and Du coaching

www.naturalrunningform.co.uk Natural Running Form Coach

2018 Training Camps http://www.appliedtri.co.uk/training-camps/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jorgan




Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Posts: 16408
Location: alles was ich bin, alles was ich war

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the PMs of Germany and the UK would have loved a bit of advanced viewing this time last year.
_________________
25 Years since it all began....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
explorerJC




Joined: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 14788
Location: Farthingstone

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jorgan wrote:
I think the PMs of Germany and the UK would have loved a bit of advanced viewing this time last year.


I think both were predictable, no?
_________________
www.appliedtri.co.uk Tri and Du coaching

www.naturalrunningform.co.uk Natural Running Form Coach

2018 Training Camps http://www.appliedtri.co.uk/training-camps/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jorgan




Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Posts: 16408
Location: alles was ich bin, alles was ich war

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

explorerJC wrote:
Jorgan wrote:
I think the PMs of Germany and the UK would have loved a bit of advanced viewing this time last year.


I think both were predictable, no?


Clearly not in May's case Very Happy
_________________
25 Years since it all began....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
explorerJC




Joined: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 14788
Location: Farthingstone

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jorgan wrote:
explorerJC wrote:
Jorgan wrote:
I think the PMs of Germany and the UK would have loved a bit of advanced viewing this time last year.


I think both were predictable, no?


Clearly not in May's case Very Happy


very badly advised, i think...
_________________
www.appliedtri.co.uk Tri and Du coaching

www.naturalrunningform.co.uk Natural Running Form Coach

2018 Training Camps http://www.appliedtri.co.uk/training-camps/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tigger




Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 2765
Location: Hampshire

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 5:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SloggingScotsman wrote:
if I had kept up my practice and not spent my time on ICAEW retraining I may well have been able to TinPot.


SloggingScotsman wrote:
what I post is all auditable, Verifiable, and true


So with all you ICAEW retraining, being a former auditor, how would someone go about auditing what you have said?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SloggingScotsman




Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 2639

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tigger wrote:
SloggingScotsman wrote:
if I had kept up my practice and not spent my time on ICAEW retraining I may well have been able to TinPot.


SloggingScotsman wrote:
what I post is all auditable, Verifiable, and true


So with all you ICAEW retraining, being a former auditor, how would someone go about auditing what you have said?
a fair question and one that I have been asked here and answered months ago now by another ex auditor. I was a tax man btw, but obviously with junior audit training.

Assuming you want to audit work done by crv.

1. Use the US declassified documents as your framework (my personal experience, for as far as I was able to go does confirm accuracy).

2. Look at the databased results, and verify the data back to the summaries, and the summaries back to the working papers, and the working papers back to the (hopefully blind) tasking. (Funnily enough some project managers in the field don’t seem to like the idea of being audited and one is an ex lawyer, go figure?)

It’s not rocket science.

But look I am not trying to convince you of anything, but should the British government ever chose to audit what I have done and wrote, they easily can, if were ever so motivated. I would even be willing to point them in specific directions if need be.

Look Tigger, there are plenty of people doing these things globally and they are not hard to find. For me I am ploughing on turning my life around (again), while in my spare time, now that..

1. I know Viewing works as I have done it and linked evidence above, and on other threads re my sessions.

2. After a couple of years of fathoming usefulness out, I have found some uses, as explained before.

3. In my spare time over the next couple of years I am going to be applying myself to the issues of reliability.

My work will remain available who have a genuine need to know.i have even started explaining my related museum work to museum staff who have asked me about it. That’s been two decades in the making.

I would suggest anyone looks at the work if Hall and Puthof, the nuclear and laser physicists, though I accept that some have difficulty with esteemed scientists spending a decade at Stanford on this.

Don’t expect that many responses from me now, but that was a fair question, even if it has been asked here and answered before.

Probably a good job I am not a billionaire as I could then really drive this forward (some advanced expensive personal training, some maths, computer resources etc). But then again if I was a billionaire I wouldn’t have had the blend of life experiences that has enabled me here. Poetic beauty.

Anyhow beyond some training questions now and again I don’t expect you will hear much from me, but I am sure you will cope.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
explorerJC




Joined: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 14788
Location: Farthingstone

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not looking good for the sub's crew...
_________________
www.appliedtri.co.uk Tri and Du coaching

www.naturalrunningform.co.uk Natural Running Form Coach

2018 Training Camps http://www.appliedtri.co.uk/training-camps/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tigger




Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 2765
Location: Hampshire

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

explorerJC wrote:
Not looking good for the sub's crew...


It wasn't looking good from the time they said it was missing Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tigger




Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 2765
Location: Hampshire

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SloggingScotsman wrote:
It’s not rocket science.


But what you have suggested doesn't even start to answer my question.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
explorerJC




Joined: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 14788
Location: Farthingstone

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tigger wrote:
explorerJC wrote:
Not looking good for the sub's crew...


It wasn't looking good from the time they said it was missing Sad


Indeed
_________________
www.appliedtri.co.uk Tri and Du coaching

www.naturalrunningform.co.uk Natural Running Form Coach

2018 Training Camps http://www.appliedtri.co.uk/training-camps/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
explorerJC




Joined: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 14788
Location: Farthingstone

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tigger wrote:
SloggingScotsman wrote:
It’s not rocket science.


But what you have suggested doesn't even start to answer my question.


Twas ever thus
_________________
www.appliedtri.co.uk Tri and Du coaching

www.naturalrunningform.co.uk Natural Running Form Coach

2018 Training Camps http://www.appliedtri.co.uk/training-camps/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TriTalk.co.uk Forum Index -> Off-Topic All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 7 of 9
  Share
 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum





Home | About TT | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Advertising | Contact TT
Copyright ©2003-2015 TriTalk®.co.uk. All rights reserved.